Can A Landlord Charge For Carpet Replacement In California

The real deal with carpet cleaning.

Can a landlord charge for carpet replacement in california.

Thus if the tenant s damage cheated three years out of the carpets life the landlord under california law could only hold the tenant responsible for 300. The landlord should properly charge only 200 for the two years worth of life use that would have remained if the tenant had not damaged the carpet. If your landlord will replace the carpet in your rental unit then he must provide you with a copy of the receipts of the charges that they deducted on your security deposit. Carpet life years remaining.

In other words landlords bear the cost of the routine carpet cleaning when a tenant moves out. According to the department of agriculture trade and consumer protection landlords cannot charge for routine carpet cleaning during the lease or from a security deposit no matter what your lease says. Learn how much a landlord can charge for carpet cleaning and replacement and under what circumstances. 100 per year age of carpet.

Landlords can charge tenants for any damages that are beyond normal wear and tear including carpets that are badly stained or damaged. 10 years 8 years. Expected life of carpet. Under california landlord tenant guidelines a carpet s useful life.

Original cost of carpet. If the carpet originally cost 1 000 and had a life expectancy of 10 years the depreciation charge would be 100 per year. However landlords cannot charge the full price. Also it is illegal for your landlord to charge for carpet replacement when the carpet only suffered from normal wear and tear.

If the appliances or carpet were damaged by tenants or their guests landlords can deduct the cost of the replacement from the security deposit. 10 years depreciation charge 1 000 10. Even if no damage to the rental property carpet has occurred age and normal wear eventually triggers the need for replacement. Using the same example with a life expectancy of nine years and if a replacement carpet of similar quality would cost 2 000 the landlord could properly charge only 222 22 for only one years worth of life use that would have remained if the tenant had not damaged the carpet.